Posted by
Texx on Sunday, October 26, 2008 7:45:27 AM
I agree that Obama would be far worse than McCain. Far worse. It is for that reason that I want Obama to crush McCain in a landslide victory! I want McCain to lose hard. If my vote for Bob Barr will help accomplish this objective, so much the merrier.
Many other posts in this thread have already outlined McCain's and Republicans' (in general) support of big government. more pork, and more regulation. Let me assure you and reassure you that if McCain wins, the size and scope of government will grow under his presidency, just as it has under Bush.
Republicans had their chance to select a pro-liberty candidate in the primaries with Ron Paul, and they soundly rejected him. Conservative pundits such as Limbaugh, Hannity, Hewitt, and Medved ridiculed and mocked his campaign, and they now (with the exception of Medved) lament that conservatives have no real conservative choice to vote for in this election.
These are the same one who tout that there is only one issue that matters, and that is the issue of Islamoterrorism. And because Ron Paul was wrong on that one issue, he must be rejected. And now they are perplexed when polls show that the war on terror is a minor issue in the minds of most voters. Clinton was right when he once said "It's the economy, stupid." And Ron Paul was the only one who warned us about the current economic crisis well before it hit us.
As for me, I disagree with Ron Paul's limp-wristed, blame America first approach to Islamonaziism and 9/11. I would have nuked Afghanistan had I been president on 9/11. Problem wiped out. But I also have a saying. Liberty trumps security. Liberty trumps safety.
Let's repeat it together everyone.
Liberty trumps security. Liberty trumps safety.
Let's say it again.
Liberty trumps security. Liberty trumps safety.
Didn't Benjamin Franklin tell us essentially the same thing long ago? And yet, conservative pundits like Limbaugh, Hannity, Medved, and Hewitt all supported the so-called Patriot Act. As did John McCain. As do many of you. Admit it. Like them, you value safety and security over liberty. To you, the only issue that matters is the war on terrorism.
Would you have trusted the power enabled by the Patriot Act under Bill Clinton and Janet Reno? Will you still support the Patriot Act under Obama when he uses its authority and leeway as an excuse to infringe on your liberties? While Bob Barr did vote for the Patriot Act when in congress, he now regrets that vote. John McCain still supports the Patriot Act.
To argue that we need McCain to win this election is akin to arguing that we would have been better off long term had Bush 41 been reelected in 1992. If Bush 41 had won in 1992, the Republicans would not have taken control of congress in 1994. The 1994 Gingrich victory happened because of voter disgust with Bill Clinton and his Democrat-controlled House and Senate. After that victory, the Republicans for a brief period in 1995 actually pretended that they supported less government. They reneged on that support when they caved to Clinton after the government shutdown. And then they worked with Clinton over the next five years to give us bigger government and more regulation.
But there was also a lot of gridlock. It was this gridlock which kept government growing at a slightly slower rate than in the past, resulting in an economic boom. And this is what may potentially happen in two years if Obama wins the presidency. One thing that is guaranteed is that a 2010 Republican takeover of congress will not happen if McCain wins. Impossible. Just as it wouldn't have happened in 1994 had Bush 41 won in 1992.
I joined the Libertarian Party after the Republicans demonstrated that, like the Democrats, they stand for more government, more spending, more pork, more regulation, and less liberty. I voted for Harry Browne in 2000, Michael Badnarik in 2004, and I will vote for Bob Barr in 2008.
It is time to spank the Republicans by giving them a crushing Obama victory on November 4. Let's help make it happen.