About Me

Name: Texx
Location: Clarksville, IN
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Libertarian Parties of Indiana and Kentucky State Convention

The Libertarian Party of Indiana (LPIN) and the Libertarian Party of Kentucky (LPKY) are combining forces and hosting a joint state convention the weekend of May 15,16, and 17, 2009. The convention will be held along the border in Clarksville, Indiana at the Holiday Inn Lakeview, 505 Marriott Dr, Clarksville, IN 47129. It is located along I-65 just north of the Kennedy Bridge at Exit 1 - Stansifer Ave.

While we were open to holding the convention either in Indiana or in Kentucky somewhere along the border, we chose Clarksville because, unlike Louisville, KY or Jeffersonville, IN for example, Clarksville has no government-legislated smoking ban on private businesses.

Friday evening May 15 we will have two hospitality suites, one nonsmoking and the other one smoking. Come and mingle with fellow freedom lovers and eat, drink, and be festive.

Saturday, May 16 is when the primary convention activities will take place. Things will kickoff at 9:00 AM with opening remarks from LPKY Chair Ken Moellman and LPIN Chair Todd Singer. Libertarian National Committee District 3 Representative Rebecca Sink-Burris will then update us with news and events in our district along with what is going on at National.

Then we will have some workshops, presentations, and breakout sessions. These include the following:

Mark Rutherford will discuss Atlas! Liberty Pac.

Melanie Hughes will do a session on charter schools and home schooling.

Dr. Eric Schansberg will discuss Libertarian Campaigning.

Ken Moellman and Rex Bell will run a candidate training workshop.

At Noon we will have lunch. Our lunchtime speaker will be Daniel Williams. He is a radio talk show host, author, and a past candidate for the Libertarian Party Vice Presidential nomination. His topic of expertise is drugs and the drug war.

At 1:00 PM we will have concurrent business meetings for both state parties. Election of new officers and voting on amendments and other issues will be handled here. LPIN and LPKY will hold their respective business meetings in separate rooms. All other convention events will be held together.

At 4:00 PM we will hold a discussion on overall strategy. Ron Seiter will hold a workshop on organzing new Libertarian Party county affiliates.

At 5:30 PM we will have a buffet dinner. We will have two dinner speakers. First up will be Wayne Allyn Root. Wayne is a lively and dynamic speaker who makes regular appearances on Fox News and CNN. He was our Vice Presidential candidate in 2008. He will seek the Libertarian Party Presidential nomination in 2012. He is a small business owner who lives in Las Vegas with his wife and three home-schooled children. His new book will come out in June, entitled "The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gambling & Tax Cuts." His website is at Root For America www.rootforamerica.com

Our keynote speaker will be Radley Balko, Senior Editor of Reason Magazine. Reason is a Libertarian magazine that tackles the issues with wit and flair. Radley is an active blogger. His website is at The Agitator www.theagitator.com

Sunday, May 17 we will have a buffet breakfast with speaker Ed Coleman. Ed is an Indianapolis City Councilman who made the news when he publically left the Republican Party and switched to the Libertarian Party. He will discuss his party switch, the outrage that Republicans had with him over his decision, and what actions by the Republicans led him to make the switch.

Several convention packages are available. Student dicounts are available for students age 24 or under. Register online at either Libertarian Party of Indiana www.lpin.org or Libertarian Party of Kentucky www.lpky.org

If you are a Libertarian or freedom lover and will be in the Louisville area next weekend, I encourage you to attend the Libertarian Party of Indiana and Kentucky State Convention 2009.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why John McCain Will Lose The 2008 Election

As I type this blog entry, it is around 10:00 AM on Election Day morning. The polls are open, and we are still many hours away from knowing the election results.

While Barack Obama has held a slight lead over John McCain in recent weeks, John McCain's poll numbers have been surging over the last few days. Some people believe that John McCain will come out ahead and win this election. I predict that John McCain will lose.

Barack Obama has run an overall positive campaign which has provided a vision and a direction for the United States. I am not saying that I agree with Obama's message and vision, only that it is there. In contrast, John McCain has run a weak and inept campaign that has lacked any real vision. His campaign reminds me much of Bob Dole's 1996 campaign where he lost by double digits to Bill Clinton.

Bob Dole and John McCain have much in common. They are both veterans and war heroes who were both injured in war. They were both 72 years old on Election Day. In essence, they were both walking cadavers who lacked any real enthusiasm in their campaign messages.

Bob Dole claimed that he would cut taxes. He wasn't believable because he had voted for tax increases in the past. During the presidential debates he sounded flat, flaccid, and bored. During the recent presidential debates between John McCain and Barack Obama, John McCain sounded ineffective and unconvincing, based on his own past record.

John McCain claims he will cut spending and veto any earmarks. His past record in the Senate shows otherwise. He recently voted for the bailout boondoggle which was loaded with earmarks.

He pushed the McCain-Feingold legislation down our throats. This legislation was the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform or BCRA law which is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

He supports the McCain-Lieberman bill which will ban gun sales at gun shows without a background check. Thus he has utter contempt for the Second Amendment. The NRA gave him a C- rating. Yes Obama's NRA rating is an F. But it isn't enough of a difference to convince enough voters to support McCain.

He strongly supported the unconstitutional Patriot Act as well as its recent renewal. He flip-flopped like John Kerry in that he opposed the Bush tax cuts before he supported them.

The point is that voters have not forgotten John McCain's past, so they view his current claims with healthy skepticism. Simply put, he isn't resonating with enough voters to push him to victory over Barack Obama.

In 2004, John Kerry ran a negative campaign against George W. Bush. John Kerry offered no message of hope, no vision, no direction, only negativity and criticism of Bush. Granted, most Democrat voters didn't like having John Kerry as their candidate, so their mantra during the 2004 campaign was "Anyone but Bush." Democrat voters weren't voting for John Kerry. They were voting solely against George W. Bush. That was their sole aim and message. And it backfired.

Likewise in this campaign, most Republican voters decry having John McCain as their nominee, as he has no real vision, so their mantra is "Anyone but Obama." "I don't like McCain, but I must vote for him to thwart Obama." Like the Democrats in 2004, Republicans are not voting for John McCain. They are voting against Barack Obama. Once again, this motive for voting is a vote based on negativity. Campaigns based mainly on negativity simply don't work.

John McCain will lose today's election for these two reasons. His message isn't credible based on his past record, just like Bob Dole in 1996. And his Republican voters are voting not for him but against his opponent. These strategies will not work. They will not push John McCain to victory. The race will still be razor-close, but Barack Obama will still squeak out a victory tonight.

If my prediction is wrong, it won't be my first time. On May 17, 2007, almost a year and a half ago, I wrote a blog wherein I predicted that Mitt Romney and Al Gore would be the two main nominees and that Al Gore would win the election. If John McCain does manage to win tonight, I believe it will be because enough voters will have voted for Sarah Palin in essence.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Comment on Bob Barr's 10/24/2008 Column

I agree that Obama would be far worse than McCain.  Far worse.  It is for that reason that I want Obama to crush McCain in a landslide victory!  I want McCain to lose hard.  If my vote for Bob Barr will help accomplish this objective, so much the merrier.

Many other posts in this thread have already outlined McCain's and Republicans' (in general) support of big government. more pork, and more regulation.  Let me assure you and reassure you that if McCain wins, the size and scope of government will grow under his presidency, just as it has under Bush.

Republicans had their chance to select a pro-liberty candidate in the primaries with Ron Paul, and they soundly rejected him.  Conservative pundits such as Limbaugh, Hannity, Hewitt, and Medved ridiculed and mocked his campaign, and they now (with the exception of Medved) lament that conservatives have no real conservative choice to vote for in this election.

These are the same one who tout that there is only one issue that matters, and that is the issue of Islamoterrorism.  And because Ron Paul was wrong on that one issue, he must be rejected.   And now they are perplexed when polls show that the war on terror is a minor issue in the minds of most voters.  Clinton was right when he once said "It's the economy, stupid."  And Ron Paul was the only one who warned us about the current economic crisis well before it hit us.

As for me, I disagree with Ron Paul's limp-wristed, blame America first approach to Islamonaziism and 9/11.  I would have nuked Afghanistan had I been president on 9/11.  Problem wiped out.  But I also have a saying.  Liberty trumps security.  Liberty trumps safety.

Let's repeat it together everyone.

Liberty trumps security.  Liberty trumps safety.

Let's say it again.

Liberty trumps security.  Liberty trumps safety.

Didn't Benjamin Franklin tell us essentially the same thing long ago?  And yet, conservative pundits like Limbaugh, Hannity, Medved, and Hewitt all supported the so-called Patriot Act.  As did John McCain.  As do many of you.  Admit it.  Like them, you value safety and security over liberty.  To you, the only issue that matters is the war on terrorism.

Would you have trusted the power enabled by the Patriot Act under Bill Clinton and Janet Reno?  Will you still support the Patriot Act under Obama when he uses its authority and leeway as an excuse to infringe on your liberties?  While Bob Barr did vote for the Patriot Act when in congress, he now regrets that vote.  John McCain still supports the Patriot Act.

To argue that we need McCain to win this election is akin to arguing that we would have been better off long term had Bush 41 been reelected in 1992.  If Bush 41 had won in 1992, the Republicans would not have taken control of congress in 1994.  The 1994 Gingrich victory happened because of voter disgust with Bill Clinton and his Democrat-controlled House and Senate.  After that victory, the Republicans for a brief period in 1995 actually pretended that they supported less government.  They reneged on that support when they caved to Clinton after the government shutdown.  And then they worked with Clinton over the next five years to give us bigger government and more regulation. 

But there was also a lot of gridlock.  It was this gridlock which kept government growing at a slightly slower rate than in the past, resulting in an economic boom.  And this is what may potentially happen in two years if Obama wins the presidency.   One thing that is guaranteed is that a 2010 Republican takeover of congress will not happen if McCain wins.  Impossible.  Just as it wouldn't have happened in 1994 had Bush 41 won in 1992.

I joined the Libertarian Party after the Republicans demonstrated that, like the Democrats, they stand for more government, more spending, more pork, more regulation, and less liberty.  I voted for Harry Browne in 2000, Michael Badnarik in 2004, and I will vote for Bob Barr in 2008. 

It is time to spank the Republicans by giving them a crushing Obama victory on November 4.  Let's help make it happen.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »